Hello?! Paging the Chicago Tribune! 2004 wants its article on kids downloading music back:
SAN FRANCISCO - Going to the mall to buy music might no longer be a rite of passage for adolescents.Did you know that it was no longer a common rite of passage to go to the mall to buy CDs? Yeah, I knew, too. But you know that irks CD companies more than kids not buying CDs? Kids not paying unreasonable prices for digital downloads:
Nearly half of all teenagers bought no compact discs, a dramatic increase from 2006, when 38 percent of teens shunned such purchases, according to a report released Tuesday. Two years ago, teenagers accounted for 15 percent of CD sales. In 2007, the figure was 10 percent.
What concerns the music industry is illegal Internet file-sharing on Web sites where people pick up a digital song or album that others have uploaded. They can also do what is known as peer-to-peer file sharing, when people download music while temporarily opening up their computers to others to pick up music. The music industry says people who obtain music free online are breaking the law.I'm not trying to condone or encourage law-breaking, but clearly there's a huge disconnect between traditional definitions of property and ownership versus digital copies. There are no more 'per unit' sales to count; digital copies are infinite, easy to produce and last awhile. Can we please move beyond this argument and work on another commercial paradigm?
And if I knew what that might look like, I'd be a very smart, lucky young lady.
p.s. happy birthday to me! THis is my 100th blog post.
